Dual Registrant Lied Twice to Clients about Share Class Practices
A dually registered RIA/BD and two of its principals agreed to pay nearly $1.7 Million in disgorgement, interest and fines for recommending mutual fund share classes that paid back 12b-1 revenue sharing when lower cost shares were available. The SEC faults the firm for failing to disclose that lower share classes were available, and that the firm and its reps made the recommendations to increase revenue rather than consider the best interests of the clients. The SEC also criticizes the firm for neglecting to disclose that it avoided clearing broker ticket charges by recommending higher fee share classes. After an SEC exam uncovered the wrongdoing, the firm embarked on a campaign to convert clients to lower-fee share classes, but, according to the SEC, many reps lied about the prior availability of lower-fee classes in a scheme to convince clients to pay higher advisory fees.
Once the SEC identifies possible wrongdoing, don’t compound the problem by further misleading clients during the remediation process. It is possible that this firm could have avoided the $400,000 in fines had it not lied to clients about its past practices.