Insufficient Compliance Resources Cost Firm and CEO
The SEC fined an investment adviser $400,000 and fined and censured its CEO for failing to devote sufficient resources to compliance, thereby contributing to the firm’s failure to uncover an offering fraud. The firm appointed a portfolio manager, who did not have regulatory experience, to assume the Chief Compliance Officer role in addition to his other duties. The PM/CCO highlighted several compliance deficiencies and pleaded for more resources, but the CEO did not address his concerns, and, in fact, cut the compliance budget. The SEC maintains that the under-resourced compliance program contributed to the firm’s failure to conduct promised due diligence, which may have uncovered the offering fraud that harmed clients.
Based on our experience and several industry studies, registered investment advisers should spend at least 5% of revenue on compliance infrastructure. Also, firms should appoint a fully engaged and experienced regulatory professional to serve as Chief Compliance Officer and avoid the cheaper dual-hat model that puts both the firm and the CCO at risk. Compli-pros should take solace that the SEC did not name the CCO, presumably because he highlighted the compliance deficiencies and advised the firm on how to remediate.